Public relations, democracy and human rights in our 60th year
When asked to post during Lis’s break I thought I’d
focus not on day to day CIPR stuff. But reflect instead on a few days I spent
last week in the company of 40 remarkable people – human rights lawyers and activists,
think tank directors, business leaders, and Ivy League academics, to name but a
few, led by the formidable young Mexican diplomat Shamina de Gonzaga – when I
represented the CIPR and Global
Alliance in Paris at one of the
pre-seminars for October’s 60th anniversary of the signing of the United
Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Pure chance that CIPR and the Declaration share a
60th anniversary? No. Faced with the horrors of concentration camps and atomic
bombs the post war world could only choose idealism. And indeed the idealism of
the Declaration, its near-naivety, is still stunning. But it was also an
idealism that was shared in 1948 by the IPR founding fathers (they were all
men). They saw in professional and ethical communication a key to a more equal
post-war society.
The world has lost much innocence and idealism since
then. Theories of Government have failed, big declarations no longer appeal and
the UN itself has been, and is, responsible for some terrible setbacks. Equally
some would say that the practice of public relations has come a long, cynical
way from the idealism of the IPR in 1948.
Faced also with economic downturn and continuous
setbacks to the cause of freedom, no wonder we may want to turn inward and
focus on us, ourselves, alone.
So, pessimistic we can all be. It is fashionable to
be so – and is probably the mode into which I have now fallen back faced with
those day to day intractable issues of business, finance and personnel
management that to some degree affect us all.
But I also found cause for optimism in Paris.
First, the very nature and reputation of modern
communication. We can all take heart at how absolutely central communication
and dialogue is seen to the achievement of human rights ambitions and
development – a point already made by several of our speakers at the World Conference last month, including
Paul Mitchell of the World Bank and reflected in the London Manifesto.
This was re-iterated by me and accepted by all (even if some activists see big
business as misusing forms of public relations to disguise or misdirect). It
means in practice that, at the least, cruelty and abuse, wherever in the world,
be it in North Korea, Guantanamo or Zimbabwe, cannot be hidden. The last
bastions of secrecy are falling.
Second, (and the very basis of my presence in Paris,
representing a ‘non-governmental’ organisation to talk about our and
businesses/entrepreneurs’ responsibilities in implementing the principles of
the Declaration – always intended as a blueprint for ‘civil society’) everyone
accepts that these are matters on which we cannot – or should not – defer to
Governments alone. We are all involved
and need to accept our organisational and personal responsibilities.
I will report further...
COLIN FARRINGTON
Recent Comments